PHYSICOCHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND MELISSOPALYNOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF COMMERCIAL BUCKWHEAT HONEYS FROM POLAND

Maciej S.  Bryś; Magdalena  Kunat; Ernest  Stawiarz; Aneta A.  Ptaszyńska

doi:10.18006/2021.9(2).200.205

Authors

Maciej S. Bryś 1Department of Immunobiology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Akademicka 19 Str., 20-033 Lublin
Magdalena Kunat Department of Immunobiology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Akademicka 19 Str., 20-033 Lublin
Ernest Stawiarz Department of Botany and Plant Physiology, Institute of Plant Biology, Faculty of Environmental Biology, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 15 Str., 20-950 Lublin
Aneta A. Ptaszyńska Department of Immunobiology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Akademicka 19 Str., 20-033 Lublin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18006/2021.9(2).200.205

Keywords:

Buckwheat honeys, Honeys type, Fagopyrym, Commercial honey

Abstract

Buckwheat honey is widely consumed by consumers due to its numerous health-promoting properties. Characteristically it is dark, tea-like in colour, sharp, tickly, and sweet in flavour, and has smelled of buckwheat flowers. In the current study, various commercial honey samples were examined to test the quality of buckwheat honey samples available in the market. The research materials were comprised of 15 samples of honeys from 4 voivodships, among these, 5 samples were collected from the Świętokrzyskie Voivodship, 4 from the Lesser Poland Voivodeship, 4 from the Lubelskie Voivodship, and reset 2 samples from the Podkarpackie Voivodship. Melissopalynological analyses of investigated honeys’ samples revealed that all samples had at least 45% of Fagopyrym pollen content, which means that researched honeys complied with the standards of the International Commission for Bee Botany (ICBB) for buckwheat honey. Honeys’ samples had an average water content of 15.3% (σ= 1.24), and electrical conductivity at 0.37 mS*cm^-1. Therefore, all beekeepers correctly marked their honey type as buckwheat honey simply using the organoleptic properties of their honeys and observing their bees collecting pollen and honeydew.

References

Brudzynski K, Abubaker K, Wang T (2012) Powerful bacterial killing by buckwheat honeys is concentration-dependent, involves complete DNA degradation and requires hydrogen peroxide. Frontiers in Microbiology 3: 242.

Dalby R (2000) Classic American honey plant: buckwheat. American Bee Journal 140: 485–486.

Deng J, Liu R, Lu Q, Hao P, Xu A, Zhang J, Tan J (2018) Biochemical properties, antibacterial and cellular antioxidant activities of buckwheat honey in comparison to manuka honey. Food Chemistry 252:243-249 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.01.115.

Dżugan M, Grabek-Lejko D, Swacha S, Tomczyk M, Bednarska S, Kapusta I (2020) Physicochemical quality parameters, antibacterial properties and cellular antioxidant activity of Polish buckwheat honey. Food Bioscience 34: 100538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2020.100538.

EU Council Directive (2014) 2001/110/EC of 20 December 2001 relating to honey. 2002 OJEC. L10, 47-51. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2001/110/2014-06-23 access on 21st December 2020.

Flores MSR, Escuredo O, Seijo MC (2015) Assessment of physicochemical and antioxidant characteristics of Quercuspyrenaica honeydew honeys. Food Chemistry166: 101–106.

Halagarda M, Groth S, Popek S, Rohn S, Pedan V (2020) Antioxidant Activity and Phenolic Profile of Selected Organic and Conventional Honeys from Poland. Antioxidants (Basel). 9(1): 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9010044.

Louveaux J, Maurizio A, Vorwohl G (1970) Methods of melissopalynology (republished and updated). Bee World 59: 139–157.

Machado AM, Miguel MG, Vilas-Boas M, Figueiredo AC (2020) Honey Volatiles as a Fingerprint for Botanical Origin—A Review on their Occurrence on Monofloral Honeys. Molecules 25: 374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25020374.

Majewska E, Drużyńska B, Kowalska J, Wołosiak R, Ciecierska M, Derewiaka D (2017) Zastosowanie metod fizykochemicznych i chemometrycznych do oceny jakości i autentyczności botanicznej miodów gryczanych. Zeszyty Problemowe Postępów Nauk Rolniczych 589: 59-68.

Nešović M, Gašić U, Tosti T, Horvacki N, Šikoparija B, Nedić N, Blagojević S, Ignjatović L, Tešić Ž (2020) Polyphenol profile of buckwheathoney, nectar and pollen. Royal Society Open Science 7: 201576. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201576.

Panseri S, Manzo A, Chiesa LC, Giorgi A (2013) Melissopalynological and Volatile Compounds Analysis of Buckwheat Honey from Different Geographical Origins and Their Role in Botanical Determination. Journal of Chemistry https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/904202.

Pasini F, Gardini S, Marcazzan S, Caboni M (2013) Buckwheat honeys: Screening of composition and properties. Food Chemistry 141: 2802-2811.

Persano OL, Piana L, Bogdanov S, Bentabol A, Gotsiou P, Kerkvliet J, Martin P, Morlot M, Ortiz-Valbuena A, Ruoff K, Von der Ohe K (2004) Botanical species giving unifloral honey in Europe. Apidologie 35: 82-93.

Puścion-Jakubik A, SochaK, Borawska MH (2020) Comparative study of labelled bee honey from Poland and the result of the melissopalynological analysis, Journal of Apicultural Research 59 (5): 928-938. DOI: 10.1080/00218839.2020.1726035.

Salonen A (2011) Boreal unifrolar honeys: Screening of composition and properties. Publications of the University of Eastern Finland. Dissertations of University of Eastern Finland in Forestry and Natural Sciences, downloaded from http://epublications.uef.fi/pub/urn_isbn_978-952-61-0589-5/urn_isbn_978-952-61-0589-5.pdf.

Schramm DD, Karim M, Schrader HR, Holt RR, Cardetti M, Keen CL (2003) Honey with High Levels of Antioxidants Can Provide Protection to Healthy Human Subjects. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 51: 1732-1735. doi: 10.1021/jf025928k.

Tahoun IF, Shehata AB (2016) Preparation of Honey Reference Material for Water Content by Karl Fisher and Refractometric Methods. MAPAN 31: 25–29 doi:10.1007/s12647-015-0156-y.

Woźna J (1966) Obraz pyłkowy i barwa niektórych odmianowych miodów handlowych. Pszczelnicze Zeszyty Naukowe 10: 1-4.

Wróblewska A (2002) Rośliny pożytkowe Podlasia w świetle analizy pyłkowej produktów pszczelich. PracahabilitacyjnaWydawnictwoAkademiiRolniczej w Lublinie.

Živkov BM, Popov N, Vidaković S, LjubojevićPelić D, Pelić M, MihaljevŽeljko, Jakšić S (2018) Electrical conductivity and acidity of honey. Archives of Veterinary Medicine 11: 91-101.