Volume 6, Issue 1, February Issue - 2018, Pages:159-167
|Authors: AL-Kahtani SH, Ahmed MA*, Al-Selwey WA, Abdel-Razzak HS|
|Abstract: The effects of different agricultural crop waste composts as organic fertilizer on the growth, leaf chlorophyll content and mineral concentrations, fruit characteristics, yield, and fruit quality aspects of tomato were assessed. The composted crop waste types used were mixture of date palm, olive, and maize (1:1:1) supplemented with 5% (C2), 10% (C3), 20% (C4), and 40% (C5) of sheep manure as well as the active NPK mineral fertilizer (C1) as a check treatment. Results of present study revealed that tomato plants grown in sandy soil amended by combination of compost mixture and 40% sheep manure (C5) have highest plant height and leaf chlorophyll content as compared to the plants grown in other combinations. Further highest concentration of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), Ferrous (Fe), Zink (Zn) and manganese (Mn) along with fruit yield, and fruit quality were also reported superior in the plant grown in same combination. The percentage increase in the total yield of plants fertilized with C5 was 65.71-65.83% higher than that of plants fertilized with the compost + NPK (C1). Tomato plants grown in plots amended with compost type C5 had highest shoot dry mass, fruit length, fruit diameter, and fruit juice percentage than plants grown in other treatments. On the other hand, tomato plants under C1 treatment had higher titratable acidity and pH of fruit juice as compared to plants grown under other compost types. These results indicate that amending sandy soil with compost (date palm, olive, and maize) enriched with higher rates of sheep manure (20% and 40%) can increase growth, fruit weight, fruit volume, and yield besides improving the fruit quality characteristics of tomato.|
|Full Text: 1 Introduction Use of organic farming systems to produce vegetable crops has become more attractive during recent years because of either increased consumer demand for organically produced products or the interest of farmers to sustain or maintain soil health (Dimitri & Greene, 2002; Murmu et al., 2013). Furthermore, higher prices of organically produced vegetable products than conventional products in the fresh markets encourage farmers to grow vegetables organically. Moreover, the organically grown products are safer to eat and are more nutritious than products grown conventionally (Ramesh et al., 2005; Lester, 2006). Organic amendments are most common in vegetable crop fields through the application of composted materials or recycled crop wastes (Murmu et al., 2013; Ahirwar & Hussain, 2015). The use of recycled crop waste as organic fertilizer or soil amendment material not only provides an economic advantage to small-scale farmers, but also reduces soil pollution due to reduced use of synthetic fertilizers, pesticides, nutrient run-off, and nitrogen (N) leaching (Nyamangara et al., 2003; Liu et al. 2013; Abafita et al., 2014). Many of agricultural areas in Saudi Arabia generate large quantities of organic residues such as date palm, olive, and maize wastes, as well as fruit and vegetable processing remains. Recycling of these organic agricultural wastes has great potential to serve as sources of mulch, nutrients and organic material to enhance agricultural production and sustainability (Alburquerque et al., 2006; Altieri & Esposito, 2008; Rigane &Medhioub, 2011; Killi & Kavdir, 2013). Thus, Application of these composted materials to soil not only enhances soil organic matter and soil fertility levels but also increases microbial activity (Zayed & Abdel-Motaalet, 2005; Benito et al., 2006; Liu et al., 2013; Khan et al., 2017). Improved soil fertility and microbial activity as a result of returned such crop wastes as compost improves the condition of agricultural soil and increases root vigor and other physiological characteristics of plants such as photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll and carbohydrate content (Joshi et al., 2009; Yogev et al., 2009). On the other hand, the use of organic fertilizer with nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizers were found more valuable for maximizing yield and providing macronutrients in tomato (Khan et al., 2017). Khan et al. (2017) reported that single source of nutrients like mineral fertilizers, composts or animal manures cannot meet the nutrient demands of the crops for sustainable production; therefore, a proper ratio of organic and inorganic fertilizers is important for higher crop production. Many investigations indicated that composted crop wastes show beneficial effects on plant growth, yield and quality of tomato (Pane et al., 2015; Khan et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2017). However, there have been little experimental studies exploring influences of composted crop wastes in combination with either mineral fertilizers or manures on tomato. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to assess the influence of application of crop waste compost consisting of date palm, olive and maize wastes amended with different rates of sheep manure and NPK fertilizer on the growth, chlorophyll and mineral concentrations, yield and its components, and fruit quality of tomato under field conditions. 2 Materials and Methods 2.1 Experimental Setup Two field experiments were conducted at El-Watania Farm located in El-Jouf region, Saudi Arabia during two successive growing seasons of 2013 and 2014. The treatment plan comprised five mixtures of composted agricultural crop wastes enriched with NPK mineral actives and different rates of sheep manure as follows: C1 = (1 date palm : 1 olive :1 maize) waste + mineral actives (mixed NPK) , this treatment considered as a control. C2 = (1 date palm : 1 olive :1 maize) waste + 5% sheep manure C3 = (1 date palm : 1 olive :1 maize) waste + 10% sheep manure C4 = (1 date palm : 1 olive :1 maize) waste + 20% sheep manure C5 = (1 date palm : 1 olive :1 maize) waste + 40% sheep manure The mineral actives consisted of a mineral fertilizer mixture of 20 kg N as ammonium sulfate + 7 kg P2O5 as super phosphate + 1.25 kg K2O as potassium sulfate, added to a ton of agricultural crop wastes (crushed date palm + crushed olive trees + crushed maize plants, at a ratio of 1:1:1) (AL-Kahtani & Ahmed, 2012). Before starting the experiment, mechanical and chemical analyses of both soil and different organic compost mixtures carried out by following Chapman & Pratt (1978) procedures (Table 1). Five compost materials were applied @ 30 kg for each plot (25 plants) through incorporating them into the soil three days before transplanting. Normal cultural practices such as irrigation, weeding, insect, and disease control performed appropriately. |
Abafita R, Shimbir T, Kebede T (2014) Effects of different rates of vermicompost as potting media on growth and yield of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) and soil fertility enhancement. Sky Journal of Soil Science and Environmental Management 3: 073-077.
Ahirwar CS, Hussain A (2015) Effect of Vermicompost on growth, yield and quality of vegetable crops. International Journal of Applied Pure Science and Agriculture 1: 49-56.
Alburquerque JA, Gonzalvez J, Garcia D, Cegarra J (2006) Composting of a solid olive-mill by-product (“alperujo”) and the potential of the resulting compost for cultivating pepper under commercial conditions. Waste Management 26: 620-626.
AL-Kahtani SH, Ahmed MA (2012) Effect of different mixtures of organic fertilizers on vegetative growth, flowering, fruiting and leaf mineral content of Picual olive trees. American-Eurasian Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences 12: 1105-1112.
Altieri R, Esposito A (2008) Olive orchard amended with two experimental olive mill wastes mixtures: effects on soil organic carbon, plant growth and yield. Bioresource Technology 99: 8390-8393.
Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (AOAC) (2000) Official methods of analysis. 12th ED. Washington, D. C., USA.
Azarmi R, Ziveh PS, Satari MR (2008) Effect of vermicompost on growth, yield and nutrition status of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum). Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 11: 1797-1802.
Benito M, Masaguer A, Moliner A, Antonio RD (2006) Chemical and physical properties of pruning waste compost and their seasonal variability. Bioresource Technology 97: 2071-2076.
Chapman HD, Pratt PF (1978) Methods of analysis for soils, plant and water. University of California Division of Agricultural Science, California, Priced Pub. Pp 4034.
Dabire C, Sereme A, Parkouda C, Somda MK, Traore AS (2016) Influence of organic and mineral fertilizers on chemical and biochemical compounds content in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) var. Mongal F1. Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences 4: 631-636.
Dimitri C, Greene C (2002) Recent growth patterns in the U.S. Organic foods market. USDA Agriculture Information Bulletins No. (AIB-777), Pp 42.
Elouear Z, Bouhamed F, Boujelben N, Bouzid J (2016) Application of sheep manure and potassium fertilizer to contaminated soil and its effect on zinc, cadmium and lead accumulation by alfalfa plants. Sustainable Environment Research 26: 131-135.
Eivazi AR, Rastegarni AR, Habibzadeh Y, Mogaddam A, Khlilzadeh G (2013) Influence of manure fertilizers on morpho-physiological traits of tomato (Lycopersicun escutentum Mill). Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences 1: 89-93.
Etissa E, Dechassa N, Alamirew T, Alemayehu Y, Dessalegne L (2014) Response of fruit quality of tomato grown under varying inorganic N and P fertilizer rates under furrow irrigated and rainfed production conditions. International Journal of Development and Sustainability 3: 371-387.
Ghehsareh AM, Kalbasi M (2012) Effect of addition of organic and inorganic combinations to soil on growing property of greenhouse cucumber. African Journal of Biotechnology 11: 9102-9107.
Gulshan AB, Saeed HM, Javid S, Meryem T, Atta MI, Amin-ud-Din M (2013) Effect of animal manure on the growth and development of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.). ARPN Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science 8: 213-218.
Gutierrez-Miceli FA, Santiago-Boraz J, Molina JA, Nafate CC, Abud-Archila M, Llaven MAO, Rincon-Rosales R, Dendooven L (2007) Vermicompost as a soil supplement to improve growth, yield and fruit quality of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum). Bioresource Technology 98: 2781-2786.
Ilupeju EA, Akanbi WB, Olaniyi JO, Lawa BA, Ojo MA, Akintokun PO (2015) Impact of organic and inorganic fertilizers on growth, fruit yield, nutritional and lycopene contents of three varieties of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum (L.) Mill) in Ogbomoso, Nigeria. African Journal of Biotechnology 14: 2424-2433.
Jackson ML (1973) Soil chemicals analysis. Prentice-Hall, Inc., India. Pp 233.
Jones BJ (1977) Elemental analysis of soil extracts and plant tissue ash by plasma emission spectroscopy. Communications in Soil Sciences and Plant Analysis 8: 349-365.
Jordao CP, Nascentes CC, Cecon PR, Fontes RLF, Pereira JL (2006) Heavy metal availability in soil amended with composted urban solid wastes. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 112: 309-326.
Joshi D, Hooda KS, Bhatt JC, Mina BL, Gupta HS (2009) Suppressive effects of composts on soil-borne and foliar diseases of French bean in the field in the western Indian Himalayas. Crop Protection 28: 608-615.
Kacar B, Intal A (2008) Plant analysis. Nobel Publication, Ankara.
Khan AA, Sajid M, Rab A, Alam S, Bari A (2014) Effect of potassium sources on the growth, yield and fruit quality of tomato cultivars. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 30: 442-450.
Khan, AA, Bibi H, Ali Z, Sharif M, Shah SA, Ibadullah H, Khan K, Azeem I, Ali S (2017) Effect of compost and inorganic fertilizers on yield and quality of tomato. Academia Journal of Agricultural Research 5: 287-293.
Killi D, Kavdir Y (2013) Effects of olive solid waste and olive solid waste compost application on soil properties and growth of Solanum lycopersicum. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 82: 157-165.
Lester GE (2006) Organic versus conventionally grown produce: quality differences and guidelines for comparison studies. HortScience 41: 296-300.
Liu CH, Liu Y, Fan C, Kuang SZ (2013) The effects of composted pineapple residue return on soil properties and the growth and yield of pineapple. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 13: 433-444.
Murmu K, Swain DK, Ghosh BC (2013) Comparative assessment of conventional and organic nutrient management on crop growth and yield and soil fertility in tomato-sweet corn production system. Australian Journal of Crop Science 7: 1617-1626.
Nyamangara J, Bergstrom LF, Piha MI, Giller KE (2003) Fertilizer use efficiency and nitrate leaching in a tropical sandy soil. Journal of Environmental Quality 32: 599-606.
Pane C, Celano G, Piccolo A, Villecco D, Spaccini R, Palese AM, Zaccardelli M (2015) Effects of on-farm composted tomato residues on soil biological activity and yields in a tomato cropping system. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture 2: 1-13.
Parbha KP, Loretta YL, Usha RK (2007) An experimental study of vermin-biowaste composting for agricultural soil improvement. Bioresource Technology 99: 1672-1681.
Polat E, Demir H, Erler F (2010) Yield and quality criteria in organically and conventionally grown tomatoes in Turkey. Scientia Agricola (Piracicaba Brazil) 67: 424-429.
Porra RJ, Thompson WA, Kriedemann PE (1989) Determination of accurate extinction coefficients and simultaneous equations for assaying chlorophylls a and b extracted with four different solvents: verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic absorption spectroscopy. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 975: 384-394.
Ramesh P, Singh M, Rao SA (2005) Organic farming: Its relevance to the Indian Contex. Current Science 88: 561-568.
Rigane MK, Medhioub K (2011) Assessment of properties of Tunisian agricultural waste composts: application as components in reconstituted anthropic soils and their effects on tomato yield and quality. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 55: 785-792.
Shadchina TM, Dmitrieva VV (1995) Leaf chlorophyll content as a possible diagnostic mean for the evaluation of plant nitrogen uptake from the soil. Journal of Plant Nutrition 18: 1427-1437.
Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1980) Statistical methods. Oxford and JBH. Publishing Co. 6th Edition.
Turhan A, Seniz V (2009) Estimation of certain chemical constituents of fruits of selected tomato genotypes grown in Turkey. African Journal of Agricultural Research 4: 1086-1092.
Yogev A, Raviv M, Kritzman G, Hadar Y, Cohen R, Kirshner B, Katan J (2009) Suppression of bacterial canker of tomato by composts. Crop Protection 28: 97-103.
Youssef MA, Eissa MA (2016) Comparison between organic and inorganic nutrition for tomato. Journal of Plant Nutrition: DOI: 10.1080/01904167. 2016.1270309.
Wang XX, Zhao F, Zhang G, Zhang Y, Yang L (2017) Vermicompost improves tomato yield and quality and the biochemical properties of soils with different tomato planting history in a greenhouse study. Frontiers in Plant Scienc8:1978. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01978
Zayed G, Abdel-Motaal H (2005) Bio-active composts from rice straw enriched with rock phosphate and their effect on the phosphorous nutrition and microbial community in rhizosphere of cowpea. Bioresource Technology 96: 929-935.